ITWeb - The Technology News Site
 news
 opinion
 in depth
 surveys
 events
 itweb info
VIRTUAL PRESS OFFICES ™
FREE NEWS SERVICES
• Newsletters

• RSS feeds

• Alerts
CAREERWEB
• Register

• Post your CV

• Find your job
BRAINSTORM
• Subscribe

• Read online
iWEEK
• Subscribe

• Read online

• Get into iWeek
IT TRAINING
• TrainingWeb

ITWEB EVENTS

• Events Calendar
FEEDBACK
• Post your feedback

• Send us a news tip
back to the ITWeb home page     Brought To You By
12 October 2006 

Confusion over MTN VOIP tariffs
BY BANDILE SIKWANE , ITWEB JOURNALIST
[ Johannesburg, 12 October 2006 ] - The Independent Communications Authority of SA (ICASA) has not received a tariff application from MTN to charge customers R25 per megabyte for the use of the operator's VOIP services, it says.

However, the regulator says it will not take action against the cellular operator unless consumers lodge formal complaints against the recently introduced tariffs.

Meanwhile, MTN is adamant it has lodged an application with ICASA.

“We have filed for a tariff of R25 per megabyte with ICASA for VOIP and have the right to either block VOIP or charge the R25 per megabyte tariff. MTN lodged the tariff with ICASA in March last year,” says MTN's GM for data and messaging, Brian Seligmann.

At the time of publication, he could not, however, confirm whether ICASA has approved the tariff, but was confident this was the case.

Johannesburg-based lawyer Daniel Pretorius, a partner at Bowman Gilfillan, says: “If a mobile licensee charges tariffs that have not been lodged with and approved by ICASA, the licensee might be contravening its licence conditions, although this would require a finding by ICASA pursuant to an investigation.”

He advises consumers who believe that a licensee is charging a tariff that has not been approved by the regulator to lodge a complaint for investigation.

“If ICASA were to find that the complaint is justified, it may issue an order requiring the licensee to remedy the matter by charging approved tariffs. Aggrieved customers would have to pursue civil remedies in the courts, should they wish to claim monetary compensation,” says Pretorius.

BMI-TechKnowledge telecoms analyst Richard Hurst states: “The problem with billing VOIP traffic is that as we move towards a packet-based network environment, where IP becomes pervasive, operators will find it hard to single out packets as being either voice, data or video packets.

“In the future, the billing scenario will be based on the amount of data that is consumed, not what service is used over that pipe.”


ITWeb IT Governance 2010 Conference

ITWeb IT Governance, Risk & Compliance Conference
3 & 4 February 2010| The Forum, Bryanston
Booking fee:
R3 595.00
(excl) VAT
Exploring the value of GRC in challenging economic times
Prof. Mervyn King Hear from Mervyn King and others, including five leading SA corporates explaining best practices and legal requirements as prescribed in King III and other frameworks. Plus, attend a practical one-day workshop.

Click here to register today!


J:\itweb01\sections\workflow\sponsors\sponsor.htm


Copyright (c) 1996 - 2010 ITWeb Limited. All rights reserved.
Would you like to see your news here? Contact us for more details at itnews@itweb.co.za
Striata Rackspace Sophos BBG Technologies